fox: ravenclaw:  you keep using that word.  i do not think it means what you think it means. (claw - inconceivable (by ldymusyc))
fox ([personal profile] fox) wrote2007-02-15 05:01 pm

huh.

This morning on the radio there was a thing in the traffic report about a truck that had jackknifed or something on the highway. It was still right-side up, the reporter said, but it was at a weird angle off on the shoulder, and people were slowing down to look, blah blah blah -- "and," she said, "a couple of good samaritans have pulled over to make sure the driver is okay."

And I thought, huh -- are they really "good samaritans"?

So okay, of course they're not literally Samaritans. But I'm thinking they're not even really figuratively Samaritans; unless I'm remembering the parable very incorrectly, the whole thing about the Good Samaritan was that a Samaritan would be the last person you'd expect to stop and help you when you needed it, so it wasn't just that he stopped, but that he was a Samaritan and he stopped.

Now, maybe you can argue that commuters during rush hour are among those least likely to stop and offer help to a fellow motorist; but I suspect that when she called those people "good samaritans", the reporter simply meant they were concerned citizens.

Or am I overthinking this? (More so than usual, I mean.)

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org