![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
grand-scheme-wise, this is a minor frustration.
So the task I've been on for what seems like the past hundred years on this project is transcription of interviews and focus groups for this project. There have been five researchers conducting these, and I've fobbed off most of the interviews on my minions, because they're shorter and easier (one interviewer and one subject); the focus groups have usually about four subjects (though one memorable one had 18; I did not even attempt to keep track of them - normally I number the subjects, though this is not strictly necessary, but in that instance I called them all "subject"). Each interviewer's sessions are characterized by different features. Two of the interviewers (the two who spoke the quietest, as it happened) didn't do very many; the majority of the recordings belong to the other three.
One tends to speak very quickly, and also makes student subjects feel comfortable and relaxed (which is good!) so that they have little compunction about talking all at once (which is very, very bad).
One tends to have good rapport with officers and teachers (which is good), and to demonstrate this with occasional displays of how well he speaks their jargon, which is not always actually as well as he thinks (which is just annoying and a waste of time).
And one, who ironically is the one I get along with best in person, speaks clearly enough that I can understand her and seems to set the subjects at ease, but has the infuriating tendency to confirm that she understands the subject's point by repeating it. I mean, I know there are discourse markers and politeness strategies that involve this, and it wouldn't do to misunderstand the subject's point; I get it. And the first researcher, the fast-talking one, she did some of that too. But I think she rephrased more? Because this one, I mean seriously, they will say something, and she will say the same thing.
(I will now spare you all the trouble of being Extremely Clever by posting the first comment myself.)
One tends to speak very quickly, and also makes student subjects feel comfortable and relaxed (which is good!) so that they have little compunction about talking all at once (which is very, very bad).
One tends to have good rapport with officers and teachers (which is good), and to demonstrate this with occasional displays of how well he speaks their jargon, which is not always actually as well as he thinks (which is just annoying and a waste of time).
And one, who ironically is the one I get along with best in person, speaks clearly enough that I can understand her and seems to set the subjects at ease, but has the infuriating tendency to confirm that she understands the subject's point by repeating it. I mean, I know there are discourse markers and politeness strategies that involve this, and it wouldn't do to misunderstand the subject's point; I get it. And the first researcher, the fast-talking one, she did some of that too. But I think she rephrased more? Because this one, I mean seriously, they will say something, and she will say the same thing.
A: Tell me about your shoes.The subjects don't seem to be frustrated by this, but it's making me crazy. This is a 44-minute transcript, and I swear it could be half an hour if there weren't all this repetition. I like her a lot, but damn.
B: My shoes are brown, and they lace up.
A: So you're wearing brown shoes that lace up?
B: Yes.
(I will now spare you all the trouble of being Extremely Clever by posting the first comment myself.)