fox: linguistics-related IPA (linguistics)
fox ([personal profile] fox) wrote2011-08-29 07:08 pm

neologism watch

You guys. Today in the car on the way to PT I heard the radio weatherman invent a new word. I think. He was talking about how we'll be seeing a few showers tonight, albethem not as severe as the rain we had over the weekend.

Obviously I understand his use of 'albethem' in context, but quite seriously, is this a word now? It seems to analyze albeit right down to 'although it is/was/will be', which I'm pretty sure isn't how it got that way. Can he do that?

I don't have the OED until I'm back at my desk, so I can't look up The Experts until tomorrow.
florahart: (grammar)

[personal profile] florahart 2011-08-29 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
The google machine comes up with a bunch of instances of this usage, but that doesn't prove it's been, like recognized.

However, now I am puzzled because I think the it in albeit is a subject, innit? As you said, although it be. "It" doesn't change when it's an object, but them is the object form of they. So shouldn't it be albethey? Hm.
jae: (linguisticsgecko)

[personal profile] jae 2011-08-30 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Huh! That's really cool!

-J
kcobweb: (Default)

[personal profile] kcobweb 2011-08-30 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
This just *boggles* my mind, every time I read it.