You mean, Nancy, aka darkrosetiger? I don't think she's a troll, although I'm not sure she's chosen the best way to introduce herself to the list. I mean, if she thinks the thread is interminable, why is she adding to it?
She's been in HP for ages, though, and she's a friend of Ruth's. I just hope she's not always this annoying on-list.
Yay you for bravely responding to Q-Y. I couldn't figure out what she was trying to say. How she edits English-language zines I'll never know. Well, I suspect "badly" is the answer, but still.
yeah, i see the sig now, and thus retract the troll question.
but talk about flame-bait. "i'm not going to read the posts with any kind of care, but i'm going to go ahead and criticize the posters for neglecting to mention things"? dude.
I did some co-writing with her over in the Est for a while and she's got a really thick skin after being in HP fandom.
And like Thalia said, she's a friend of Ruth's. I suspect there is some cheerleading going on with the wank. Both of 'em are regular posters over at f_w on JF.
When I read the m_a digest last night you and Nancy were both in it and posted fairly close together. When I was still in the Est a lot of us would go look and comment on things right around the same time. It didn't seem like that huge of a leap to me.
*shrugs*
Hey, I have no problem with people being blunt on lists or anywhere else for that matter. I don't even give a you know what about f_w, never really have but it is another playground you guys shared when I was talking to you on a regular basis.
One can't retract a faux pas once it's made; darn near everyone's done it. She gets mucho kudos in my book for bucking up to admit it and apologizing publicly.
wait, indeed. if my assorted public apologies (ruth's LJ; my own LJ; the list itself) haven't reached your notice yet, there's nothing i can do about it.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif){kind=small}
no subject
no subject
no subject
She's been in HP for ages, though, and she's a friend of Ruth's. I just hope she's not always this annoying on-list.
Yay you for bravely responding to Q-Y. I couldn't figure out what she was trying to say. How she edits English-language zines I'll never know. Well, I suspect "badly" is the answer, but still.
no subject
but talk about flame-bait. "i'm not going to read the posts with any kind of care, but i'm going to go ahead and criticize the posters for neglecting to mention things"? dude.
in fact i might go over there and say so.
no subject
And like Thalia said, she's a friend of Ruth's. I suspect there is some cheerleading going on with the wank. Both of 'em are regular posters over at f_w on JF.
*sighs*
rah rah siss boom bah
Actually I was asleep during all this and didn't learn about it until about an hour ago.
So the f_w hive-vagina (tm)? Not so much.
Re: rah rah siss boom bah
*shrugs*
Hey, I have no problem with people being blunt on lists or anywhere else for that matter. I don't even give a you know what about f_w, never really have but it is another playground you guys shared when I was talking to you on a regular basis.
Things change, obviously.
Shutting up now since this is Fox's lj.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Oh, wait...
no subject
You notice I haven't said anything on list? So if this was a 'I should own up to something' comment, I'm not sure what else I can say here.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
damn. it's gone.
no subject
no subject
no subject