Ugh, you have to give them your personal information to access the Post's archives. I'd rather pay them the price of that day's paper and not give them my personal information, but that's not exactly an option. . . .
Anyway, that's not your fault. You just reminded me of one time I was on the escalator at Union Station, I believe. Not exactly one of Metro's longer escalator rides. Everyone except one person was standing on the right, and every step was occupied by a single individual. So, some guy goes walking up in front of me. Now, you'll notice that usually when this happens the first person to reach the offender stops and breathes down that person's neck, literally. I'm not sure why no one ever just says, "excuse me." But anyway, this guy tries to step in the empty space to the right of the offender. Mind you, there is a person on each step before and after said offender. Falls. Stands up. Keeps going. Offender still doesn't move, so when I get to him, I say, "excuse me," and he moves over.
Moral of the story: walking on Metro escalators can be dangerous, especially if you're a man moron.
Well, I don't know when the move stuff to their archives or however they manage their systems, all I know is it's old enough that it required signing up. . . .
Oh, crap, it looks like now they want you to sign up to read the print edition even if it's today's! Ah, the erosion of privacy in this country!
all you have to give them is Some E-mail Address. it's a registration with no information required. isn't it? (i mean, lie all you want. fuck up their data. [g])
Too much unnecessary sharing of data, I don't care what it is . . . but, as you know, if I think it's important enough for me to gain access, I'll lie. Back when they asked for your date of birth and ZIP code (do they still do that elsewhere?), I did it all the time. But I like the Post. I don't want to lie to them. I also don't want them to ask. Two words: "data mining." This stuff builds on itself.
I guess it comes down to what I said (http://www.livejournal.com/users/wholenother/39087.html) about the fandom_scruples thing: "We have too much personal information floating around and too much lying already."
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Anyway, that's not your fault. You just reminded me of one time I was on the escalator at Union Station, I believe. Not exactly one of Metro's longer escalator rides. Everyone except one person was standing on the right, and every step was occupied by a single individual. So, some guy goes walking up in front of me. Now, you'll notice that usually when this happens the first person to reach the offender stops and breathes down that person's neck, literally. I'm not sure why no one ever just says, "excuse me." But anyway, this guy tries to step in the empty space to the right of the offender. Mind you, there is a person on each step before and after said offender. Falls. Stands up. Keeps going. Offender still doesn't move, so when I get to him, I say, "excuse me," and he moves over.
Moral of the story: walking on Metro escalators can be dangerous, especially if you're a
manmoron.Okay, just thought I'd share.
no subject
no subject
Oh, crap, it looks like now they want you to sign up to read the print edition even if it's today's! Ah, the erosion of privacy in this country!
no subject
no subject
Too much unnecessary sharing of data, I don't care what it is . . . but, as you know, if I think it's important enough for me to gain access, I'll lie. Back when they asked for your date of birth and ZIP code (do they still do that elsewhere?), I did it all the time. But I like the Post. I don't want to lie to them. I also don't want them to ask. Two words: "data mining." This stuff builds on itself.
I guess it comes down to what I said (http://www.livejournal.com/users/wholenother/39087.html) about the
Oh, and