![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
how we know st. john of the gospel was a morphologist
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
John 1:1; emphasis added.
of course. morphemes bad; paradigms (= words) good. of course. and i'm still dancing about the possibility of the shape rules thing i mentioned earlier. do any of the rest of you ever feel an almost overwhelming urge to walk on your hands or stand on your head? (i do, but it's always defeated by my even more overwhelming urge not to break my neck.)
John 1:1; emphasis added.
of course. morphemes bad; paradigms (= words) good. of course. and i'm still dancing about the possibility of the shape rules thing i mentioned earlier. do any of the rest of you ever feel an almost overwhelming urge to walk on your hands or stand on your head? (i do, but it's always defeated by my even more overwhelming urge not to break my neck.)
no subject
If you read it correctly, it's all in the Bible. 'In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Could anyone ask for a plainer statement of the self-evident fact that nothing exists until someone imagines it and thereby gives it being, reality? The distinction lies only in the difference between 'being' and 'becoming' -- a distinction that cancels out when any figment-fact is examined from different ends of the entropy arrow...
Then again, this is the guy who defined "Eschatological Pantheistic Multple-Ego Solipsism" as "Scatological Panhedonism Multiple Solecisms."