Entry tags:
my turn to ask math questions.
I'm turning myself around a bit with a thing I'm trying to set up that has to do with squares.
Suppose for every x minutes you spend doing activity A, you have to spend x2 minutes doing activity B. No problem, right? If you do A for two minutes, you do B for four. If you do A for three minutes, you do B for nine. If you do A for fifteen minutes, you do B for three hours and 45 minutes. That's where I'm running into trouble, is switching between orders of magnitude. If you do A for an hour, that's 60 minutes, so you do B for 60*60 = 3600 minutes, or 60 hours, or two and a half days. So far so good, right?
If you do A for a solid week, that's 168 hours, by my calculations. So now you do B for 168*168 = 28,224 hours, or (divided by 24 hours per day) 1176 days, or (divided by 365 days per year) three years and almost a quarter.
If you do A for a solid month, that's 30 days, so you do B for 30*30 = 900 days ...
... but how can a square month be shorter than a square week? Even if I make the month 31 days, I only get 961.
The obvious answer is that I've skipped some necessary step somewhere, but for the life of me, I can't work out what I'm doing wrong. Someone who didn't need special tutoring in geometry and trig, help me out, wouldya?
I may have worked it out myself: is the answer that if I want to talk about how many minutes I have to do B, I have to work out how many minutes I've done A, and shortcutting to days and weeks and months and so on isn't going to work until I've got a total? Because (7*24)2/24 is just not the same thing as 72? Because if I do the month example with hours, I get 720*720 = 518,400 hours, or (divided etc.) 21,600 days, which is rather more than three years, I admit.
Suppose for every x minutes you spend doing activity A, you have to spend x2 minutes doing activity B. No problem, right? If you do A for two minutes, you do B for four. If you do A for three minutes, you do B for nine. If you do A for fifteen minutes, you do B for three hours and 45 minutes. That's where I'm running into trouble, is switching between orders of magnitude. If you do A for an hour, that's 60 minutes, so you do B for 60*60 = 3600 minutes, or 60 hours, or two and a half days. So far so good, right?
If you do A for a solid week, that's 168 hours, by my calculations. So now you do B for 168*168 = 28,224 hours, or (divided by 24 hours per day) 1176 days, or (divided by 365 days per year) three years and almost a quarter.
If you do A for a solid month, that's 30 days, so you do B for 30*30 = 900 days ...
... but how can a square month be shorter than a square week? Even if I make the month 31 days, I only get 961.
The obvious answer is that I've skipped some necessary step somewhere, but for the life of me, I can't work out what I'm doing wrong. Someone who didn't need special tutoring in geometry and trig, help me out, wouldya?
I may have worked it out myself: is the answer that if I want to talk about how many minutes I have to do B, I have to work out how many minutes I've done A, and shortcutting to days and weeks and months and so on isn't going to work until I've got a total? Because (7*24)2/24 is just not the same thing as 72? Because if I do the month example with hours, I get 720*720 = 518,400 hours, or (divided etc.) 21,600 days, which is rather more than three years, I admit.

no subject
ETA, because I can't help it: Thinking of minutes in terms of fractions of hours might help you make sense of it. 15 minutes is 1/4 of an hour, right? But if you spend a quarter of an hour doing A, it doesn't mean you spend 1/16 of an hour doing B.
I could go on if you need me to, but I'll just stop before this gets insane.
no subject
(See, it's better that I left math when I did. Minutes is fine. I'd much rather multiply everything in my life by 60 for the next day and a half than try to work out how to square fractions of hours without squaring fractions. For the degree to which this is all going to matter, I've already spent too long worrying about it. [g])
no subject
And remember, with positive fractions less than one, when you square them they get smaller. Freaks my GMAT students out every time. So, yeah, in the case here you would do 3.75 minutes of B.
no subject
:-D
no subject
To compare the two, you need to use the *same* unit. In the week, you used hours but in the month you used days. If you convert the week to 7 days, then you can compare 7 days to 30 days.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Exactly... (7*24)2/24 = (72*242)/24 = 72 * 24
no subject
no subject
What people said above; your units matter. Technically, if you square the number, and you want units to still work, you've got to square the units also. Think about doing something similar with lengths, instead of time. If you have a length that's 24 inches (or 2 feet), and you square it without keeping track of units, you'd get a 576 inch length -- that's 24 feet. But 24 inches is 2 foot, and 2 squared is 4 feet -- it's just like your days vs. minutes problem.
But if you square your units also, you don't get a 576 inch length, you get a square that's 24 inches on a side, for an area of 576 square inches -- and that same square is 2 feet on a side, or 4 square feet. (576 square inches is equal to 4 square feet.) So if you square your units as well as your numbers, then you get the same answer no matter what units you use -- inches, feet, cms, whatever.
Unfortunately, your answer is in square inches, or square feet -- it's different units. And square minutes really don't mean anything. (Well, there are situation in physics where you work with squared time -- acceleration due to gravity is 32 feet per second squared -- but that's way tangential.) If you're not going to treat the units nicely, then you've got to pick one units -- minutes, or hours, or days -- and always use that.
(Just as one square foot is 144 square inches, which you can see by drawing a square and dividing it into a 12x12 grid, one square week is equal to 49 square days; one square (30-day) month is equal to 900 square days.)
no subject
I am going to work hard to make this not mean there is a lot of multiplying by 60 in my future. :-D
no subject
no subject