fox: linguistics-related IPA (linguistics)
fox ([personal profile] fox) wrote2004-08-12 11:35 pm
Entry tags:

a random thought about regressive assimilation

why don't we say *imvisible? (is it because [v] is labiodental rather than bilabial?)

[identity profile] darthfox.livejournal.com 2004-08-13 09:23 am (UTC)(link)
There's pretty much no consonant left, just the nasalized vowel before it, the tongue is totally wrong for English.

yeah, but a nasalized vowel is not more nasal than a nasal consonant. it's just more vocalic.

[identity profile] wholenother.livejournal.com 2004-08-13 09:38 am (UTC)(link)
Fair enough. The nasality is just very obvious. Like the difference between a white light in the sun and the same one at night.

[identity profile] darthfox.livejournal.com 2004-08-13 09:46 am (UTC)(link)
i think that's the difference between the nasal vowel and the oral vowel you're hearing -- not the difference between the nasal vowel and the nasal consonant.