maybe they don't have irony there.
here's a question about SGA that someone may have asked before somewhere i wasn't looking:
i can get behind the idea that teyla was speaking figuratively, or from the wraiths' point of view, when she said "they ... cull their human herd", and that the humans don't actually think of themselves as a herd. that's fine. but, they do all use the word culling to describe what the wraith do to them.
so why is there not more vegetarianism out there? i mean, it apparently bothers nobody that people who run and scream when the wraith come to gather (human) food will go into the forest to hunt game for their own people? i'm not saying the wraith are right, you understand, and it would be nicer of them to kill their dinner before eating it, and torturing people with the idea that they might be set free if they lead the wraith to morepeople food is very bad. but ultimately, the wraith are hunters, and the humans are prey. wouldn't you think that, understanding that, the people might quit hunting themselves?
(also: in a fight between the wraith and the reavers, who would win?)
[eta: okay, i take the point that people may not be able to afford, health-wise, not to eat meat. but the question, really, is why there is no acknowledgment that hunter:food animal::wraith:human. the athosians (at least) are portrayed as enough of a spiritual, respect-for-the-land, quasi-native-american society that you'd (or at least i'd) think this would have come up.]
i can get behind the idea that teyla was speaking figuratively, or from the wraiths' point of view, when she said "they ... cull their human herd", and that the humans don't actually think of themselves as a herd. that's fine. but, they do all use the word culling to describe what the wraith do to them.
so why is there not more vegetarianism out there? i mean, it apparently bothers nobody that people who run and scream when the wraith come to gather (human) food will go into the forest to hunt game for their own people? i'm not saying the wraith are right, you understand, and it would be nicer of them to kill their dinner before eating it, and torturing people with the idea that they might be set free if they lead the wraith to more
(also: in a fight between the wraith and the reavers, who would win?)
[eta: okay, i take the point that people may not be able to afford, health-wise, not to eat meat. but the question, really, is why there is no acknowledgment that hunter:food animal::wraith:human. the athosians (at least) are portrayed as enough of a spiritual, respect-for-the-land, quasi-native-american society that you'd (or at least i'd) think this would have come up.]
no subject
No, because humans find themselves intellectually superior to animals. Killing an animal is no big thing because they aren't intelligent, feeling creatures. Even if there is evidence to the contrary. :)
At least that's one explanation I have heard.
no subject
no subject
no subject
<--- is really upset he got rid of his Sheppard "Bitch Bitch Bitch" icon...
no subject
no subject
When you're hungry, irony is not a factor.
no subject
Even the planets that have subsistence agriculture-level societies can't ignore meat as an occasional supplement. The margin is just too narrow.
no subject
My vote goes to the reavers, but only because I think that the wraith are hella-lame, and the reavers scared the poop out of me. Well, not literally, but they were a pretty frightening enemy. When I see the wraiths, I think goth. When I see reavers, I think "that dude is going to eat my intestines while I watch."
I haven't watched anything other than the first few eps of SG:A. Aren't the wraith near-invincible?
no subject
I'd say that some acknowledgment of the parallels between two (Athosian and Wraith) hunter gatherers would be nice on a narrative level, but I agree that survival would be a first priority for the Athosians. Then again, we've never seen them hunt. Maybe when they kill game they say something about respecting the beast that had to die so they could live or something.