Jun. 23rd, 2008

fox: my left eye.  "ceci n'est pas une fox." (Default)
from all around the place: When you see this meme, quote something from Doctor Who.
"It is not a paradox, it is a dilemma, and I wish you would all shut up!"

The Doctor, having been divided into three parts like Gaul, in Caerdroia
fox: little cartoon self (doll)
So I just got an e-mail from [livejournal.com profile] sanj, talking about shopping, as we sometimes do. Not trying to buy this dress at full price, she says to me, but I'm watching like a hawk for when it goes on sale.

Here is the dress. Nice dress. Will look great on [livejournal.com profile] sanj. But does anyone besides me see the SERIOUS GLARING PROBLEM with this thing?

Note please that this is a merchant that declares "Sophisticated Style, Size 12+", and that in the URL for this item we find that we're in the directory "plus-size-clothing". We will skip over the rant about how if you're going to create a boundary between "plus" sizes and "regular" (or, as I like to call them, "minus") sizes, size 12 shouldn't be it, and look in the size bar for this particular dress.

The smallest size available is "0X (10-12)". ZERO-X, y'all. NOT-XL. Why would you offer this in a "plus-size" line? If you've set aside a place where the "plus-size" have to shop by themselves, isn't it, forgive me, at least rude and possibly even cruel to clutter up their options with "not-XL" sizes? And THEN there's the fact that they wouldn't have such a thing if some size 10 somewhere hadn't felt driven out of the minus-size department.

I can't decide on whose behalf I'm angrier -- the perfectly normal and happy fat chicks or the medium-sized girl who thinks (a) she's fat and (b) that's bad.

Profile

fox: my left eye.  "ceci n'est pas une fox." (Default)
fox

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 12 3456
78 910111213
14151617181920
21 222324252627
28293031   

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags