Usually, when the subject of pervasive (often subconscious) misogyny in fanfic (especially slash) comes up, I either (a) run and hide or (b) wind up playing devil's advocate, because -- well, because that's what I do.
It's not that I don't think there's misogyny. I totally agree that there is. And it's pervasive, though probably often subconscious. The tendency to squash female characters -- whether by casting them as helpless weaklings or as scheming bitches (or somewhere along the continuum), whether they have any relationship with the slash objects in the first place, whether the female characters themselves are canon or original -- it's everywhere. Or, I mean, it's everywhere I've looked. I don't play in a wide range of fandoms.
Where I tend to get snarled at is in maintaining the position that the squashing of ex-wives and -girlfriends is at least as much because they're exes as it is because they're women. Castigation of exes, male or female, deserving or not, is something people do. I think it's very, very likely that many slashers beat up on the male leads' female exes (or the exes' reputations) out of some sort of sympathy for the leads themselves. Carolyn Plummer (
The Sentinel) and Stella Kowalski (
due South) get a lot of this, though there's no canon evidence that Jim or Ray -- or anyone else, frankly -- dislikes either of them as much as some fans seem to. Samantha Wells (TS) and Alex Barnes (TS) and Victoria Metcalfe (DS) and Meg Thatcher (DS) get hit as well, but at least they all (to greater or lesser degrees [g]) present actual dangers to the leads in question. Lisa McCall (
Sports Night) gets it in canon from Dan and Dana as well as from Casey. The trouble, really, is that there are no (well, damned few)
female leads whose (the world being what it is)
male exes can be similarly shredded. If we had them, though, I believe we'd do it -- if Megan Connor (TS), for example, whom people seem to like okay, had an ex, he'd be a no-good bum who hadn't deserved her. Right?
Of course -- and this is why it's just been devil's advocacy, because I do agree -- the thing of it really is that it hardly matters
why female characters get it between the eyes in the court of fannish opinion. The point is that they
do, and that there's so often so little use for it. Most stories need conflict, and most conflicts need some sort of antagonist, but girl-bashing without purpose is just as sloppy as use of other devices without purpose -- and it's worse, because no matter what the intention was, the perception is that it's a female character getting a drubbing.
Which brings me to the thing that got my thoughts churning in this direction.
Family Portrait, by Journey.
( It's a year old, but in case you haven't read it ... )