Mar. 31st, 2011

fox: technical difficulties: please stand by. (technical difficulties)
This has occurred to me before, and I bet someone around here knows the answer.

Dahlia Travers and Agatha Gregson: sisters, or not? (Uncle Wiki says they're sisters, but doesn't give a specific citation. So how do we know this? The fact that they share a nephew is not, obvs., sufficient; my nephew has two aunts and we are no relation to each other - not even sisters-in-law, in fact.)
fox: my left eye.  "ceci n'est pas une fox." (Default)
Things I knew about Jane Eyre before I read it:
  • who was living in the attic
  • fire bad
  • "Reader, I married him."


Things I didn't know but saw coming about a thousand words before Jane did
  • that Rochester was the gypsy fortune-teller
  • that the Rivers kids were Jane's long-lost cousins


All in all, I liked it (and now I will have less guilt about going to see the movie, which I think I will do on Saturday). But I did continue to think, as I thought after the first half-dozen chapters, that it was All A Bit Much. Sign of the times, I suppose? Also, I keep hearing things about this being all full of the feminism, and I have to say I'm not sure I saw it?, but maybe I'm looking for the wrong things. I did applaud Jane's refusal to marry Rivers because she knew he didn't actually love her; but her general doormattery, refusal to marry Rivers notwithstanding, made it hard for me to see her as a feminist icon. (Okay, I also see where she was more satisfied with Rochester when she could be of some practical use in the relationship instead of just living off his millions. So okay: two things.)


I've now read one chapter of Wuthering Heights, and so far I think the narrator is even more of a jackass than he wants us to believe Heathcliff is. Are we supposed to find Lockwood sympathetic at all?
fox: linguistics-related IPA (linguistics)
Since [personal profile] jae brought up the famous Eskimo vocabulary hoax (and its Dutch and, I maintain, English cousin, as well), I was reminded that from time to time I am amused by how many epithets we can use in English by prefixing something onto the word head. Observe (though this will not be an exhaustive list because I am much nicer than that [g]):

insulting prefixes to add to -head:

  • block-
  • bone-
  • butt-
  • chowder-
  • chuckle-
  • dick-
  • doo-doo-
  • dunder-
  • lunk-
  • meat-
  • poopy-
  • shit-
  • thick-


Other suggestions are more than welcome, of course, to say nothing of related concepts like addle- (-pate[d]), bird- (-brain), etc.

All of these imply that the object of the epithet is of less than normal intelligence, of course. Interestingly, I can think of just the one such thing implying that the object is of greater than normal intelligence (and it's not exactly a compliment, is the thing):

prefixes going the other way:
  • egg-


Thoughts?

Profile

fox: my left eye.  "ceci n'est pas une fox." (Default)
fox

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 1 23456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags