Goodish meeting with supervisor this morning. He said (again) that he was very sorry the news had come as such a shock to me -- we talked some about all our previous communication and agreed that he thought he'd been giving signals but I, apparently, had missed them. But the reason for that -- and this does make sense, it's not just post hoc rationalization -- is that the MPhil result and the DPhil recommendation are two different things, and going 'danger, danger' would have been inappropriate for what was really a pretty good MPhil, which was after all the main point. Results breakdown:
Paper A (general theory): 72
Syntax: 70
Thesis: 67
Phonology: 66
Morphology: 65
That's an average of 68, a good out-of-my-way 2:1 (read: B+/A-), overall, which is -- as he kept. on. emphasizing -- absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, but, at the same time, doesn't indicate that further independent research is necessarily a good plan. And the more we talked about it, combined with having talked to my mother and continued thinking about it last night, the more I saw that it's true, you know, independent research is not so much my main strength. Guided and/or supervised research, no problem, and I can write very well, but I've never yet had a topic to research that I felt passionate about researching for itself. Because it's been assigned: sure. Because research is nifty: also sure. (Meta, but sure.) But because I care so much about that topic that I can't do anything else: NSM.
In short: my MPhil is good, and there will be no hesitation from anyone in the department to provide references (for jobs or further study) on the strength of it -- and such references will never make any mention of anything along lines like 'we didn't want her for the DPhil'. Chiefly because it's not true that they didn't want me; more that they saw it was unlikely to be the best fit.
I'm exhausted, but feeling a little better.
Paper A (general theory): 72
Syntax: 70
Thesis: 67
Phonology: 66
Morphology: 65
That's an average of 68, a good out-of-my-way 2:1 (read: B+/A-), overall, which is -- as he kept. on. emphasizing -- absolutely nothing to be ashamed of, but, at the same time, doesn't indicate that further independent research is necessarily a good plan. And the more we talked about it, combined with having talked to my mother and continued thinking about it last night, the more I saw that it's true, you know, independent research is not so much my main strength. Guided and/or supervised research, no problem, and I can write very well, but I've never yet had a topic to research that I felt passionate about researching for itself. Because it's been assigned: sure. Because research is nifty: also sure. (Meta, but sure.) But because I care so much about that topic that I can't do anything else: NSM.
In short: my MPhil is good, and there will be no hesitation from anyone in the department to provide references (for jobs or further study) on the strength of it -- and such references will never make any mention of anything along lines like 'we didn't want her for the DPhil'. Chiefly because it's not true that they didn't want me; more that they saw it was unlikely to be the best fit.
I'm exhausted, but feeling a little better.