update from the snowy north
Jan. 11th, 2009 12:07 amI was going to post an update from Green Bay, but then I figured, sod it, everyone who cares about the curling will be checking the standings on more official websites, and the rest of you reading this care more about me than about the curling. (Don't you?) So, here's where we are after five draws:
I also know that McCormick faces both Wright and Potter tomorrow. Smith's opponent can't be wright, because Smith has the last bye and Wright v. McCormick is the first game. So if Smith wins, and McCormick loses twice (to Wright and then Potter), and Wright also wins her second game, then I'll have Potter on 6-0, Smith on 4-2, and McCormick and Wright and maybe someone else tied on 3-3 -- also no problem. The nightmare scenario, then, is Smith losing and McCormick losing twice with Wright losing her second game; then I'd have Potter on 6-0 and Smith, McCormick, and Wright all tied on 3-3 for the second Qualifying spot. Three-way ties for one spot = two tiebreakers = games on Monday, and Fox changes her flight and then cries and cries.
Let's not have that happen, shall we?
Potter 4-0You will see from these standings that Carlson and Smith have one game remaining apiece; each has one of the byes tomorrow. So Carlson is done; the best she can do is 1-5, which with everyone else on a maximum of four losses will not be enough to get her to the Challenge Round. I forget what all the rest of the matchups for tomorrow are, but I do know that there's a possibility of a four-way tie at 3-3, which is actually NO PROBLEM, because if Potter and McCormick are the top two finishers and everyone else but Carlson is tied at 3-3, that's a four-way tie for three Challenge spots, which actually works out to a two-way tie for one Challenge spot, meaning only one tiebreaker.
McCormick 3-1
Smith 3-2
Wright 2-2
Sormunen 2-2
Karst 1-3
Carlson 0-5
I also know that McCormick faces both Wright and Potter tomorrow. Smith's opponent can't be wright, because Smith has the last bye and Wright v. McCormick is the first game. So if Smith wins, and McCormick loses twice (to Wright and then Potter), and Wright also wins her second game, then I'll have Potter on 6-0, Smith on 4-2, and McCormick and Wright and maybe someone else tied on 3-3 -- also no problem. The nightmare scenario, then, is Smith losing and McCormick losing twice with Wright losing her second game; then I'd have Potter on 6-0 and Smith, McCormick, and Wright all tied on 3-3 for the second Qualifying spot. Three-way ties for one spot = two tiebreakers = games on Monday, and Fox changes her flight and then cries and cries.
Let's not have that happen, shall we?