me! and them.
Mar. 3rd, 2004 07:13 pm1. them: the social worker said yes! so my friends will, as soon as the paperwork goes through, begin the process of adopting all four children. their next prayers (these are folks who seriously believe in the power of prayer, literally, which, okay, fine) have to do with forming a bond with the kids, that the kids not be afraid -- of them, of flying, of moving to a new life, etc. -- and that they be able to talk to the kids about their possible name changes and reach some agreement in that area.
i sent an e-mail wishing all six of them the very best of luck and happiness, and delicately trying to encourage them not to change the kids' names. (anastasia, 7; katerina, 6; valentina, 5; and sergei, 4. i'm half in love with those kids already.) or at least, if they feel they must give them new names for use in america, not to make them jettison the ones they've already got. (tell a four-year-old child, No, those aren't your sisters' names any more. gah! like these children haven't been through enough already.)*
2. me: for lo, i have an Agenda. tonight, there will be: the doing of laundry; the baking of two batches of amaretto cookies (one with nuts, one without); and, if there's still time, the putting away of more Stuff. woo-hoo!
*i can dig that the parents in this scenario might have family names that it's important to them to pass on. but these kids aren't babies, and they already know each other -- not just themselves -- by the names they already have. i can also see the interest in giving them more "mainstream" type american names, although i don't share it myself; but surely the girls can be stacey and katie and tina with absolutely no effort, and i'm sure if i thought about it for forty-five more seconds i could come up with an american-style nickname for the boy as well.
i sent an e-mail wishing all six of them the very best of luck and happiness, and delicately trying to encourage them not to change the kids' names. (anastasia, 7; katerina, 6; valentina, 5; and sergei, 4. i'm half in love with those kids already.) or at least, if they feel they must give them new names for use in america, not to make them jettison the ones they've already got. (tell a four-year-old child, No, those aren't your sisters' names any more. gah! like these children haven't been through enough already.)*
2. me: for lo, i have an Agenda. tonight, there will be: the doing of laundry; the baking of two batches of amaretto cookies (one with nuts, one without); and, if there's still time, the putting away of more Stuff. woo-hoo!
*i can dig that the parents in this scenario might have family names that it's important to them to pass on. but these kids aren't babies, and they already know each other -- not just themselves -- by the names they already have. i can also see the interest in giving them more "mainstream" type american names, although i don't share it myself; but surely the girls can be stacey and katie and tina with absolutely no effort, and i'm sure if i thought about it for forty-five more seconds i could come up with an american-style nickname for the boy as well.